
Up front, I want to say this to all the music critics out there: Respect. I can’t do what you do. Sure, I dabble in music writing. But routinely describing and evaluating performances and recordings? I’d feel more confident doggypaddling across the ocean.
That said — and I know I’m not alone in this — I have noticed and been irked by the tendency of music critics to recycle certain adjectives. Chief among them: angular. It’s a byword that critics use offhandedly as if I’m supposed to know what it means. Like it’s obvious what angular sounds like.
Casual reading of reviews wasn’t giving me a satisfactory definition, and so I embarked on a systematic interrogation of the literature. Plumbing the depths of library databases and web archives, slowly I pieced together a spreadsheet containing nearly 4,000 citations across 16 publications. Unavoidably incomplete, this corpus nonetheless provides a representative sample of the angular zeitgeist.1
Much of the evidence I’ve gathered is diffuse and contradictory. For example, angular has been used to describe rock songs as different-sounding as “Lithium” by Nirvana2 and “20th Century Schizoid Man” by King Crimson.3 Albums garnering the description include Donovan’s “Sunshine Superman,”4 Lindsey Buckingham’s “Go Insane,”5 and Kenny Loggins’s “Leap of Faith.”6 Far from indicating a narrow definition, my research suggests there is a broad spectrum of angularity in music.
But if you’re only here for a quick answer, try this: The meaning of angular often depends on the genre. In writing about classical and jazz music, it often applies to large melodic jumps — in a word, atonality. On the other hand, in writing about rock and pop, it often applies to choppy rhythms — in a word, staccato.
Puzzling over the meaning of angular rock is what got me started on this foolish quest, so let’s begin our discussion with that genre.
Rock and pop
Archives I consulted for this project are essentially limited to articles published in the 21st century. Judging from these sources, the most angular years in rock and pop were 2005 and 2007, where the term was applied to dozens of different bands from the Afghan Whigs to Youth Group. The following line chart — itself very angular — plots instances of the term as used across 11 publications from 2000 to 2025.

Album and concert reviews are almost always published in the same year as their subject. But profiles, obituaries, and other articles often refer to past works. In this way, a band or a piece of music may earn the angular label retroactively. For example, a writer in 2001 called attention to the “first angular chords” of Elton John’s “Bennie and the Jets,” which was recorded almost three decades earlier.
Occasionally writers will note a modern band reaching all the way back to the 1960s to invoke “surf rock’s angular riffs.” But what makes a riff angular? Does it leap all around the fretboard like Dick Dale on “Miserlou”? Or does it have a staccato feel like his backing band, the Del-Tones?
It would seem to be the latter, judging by the band most frequently associated with angular. The Scottish group Franz Ferdinand helped launch an early 2000s wave of “indie” rock sometimes labeled “dance punk.” As NME’s Emily Barker wrote of the band in a 2014 retrospective: “Their self-titled debut can be held solely responsible for the popularisation of the term ‘angular’ to describe guitar riffs.” That’s exaggerated, but not by much.
Franz Ferdinand’s breakthrough hit, “Take Me Out” (2004) is certainly staccato. At times, the guitars, bass, and drums are all in unison, playing “four on the floor” — that is, on downbeats only, without any sustain or interstitial ornamentation. Another band frequently described as angular is Bloc Party, whose song “Banquet” (2004) is propelled by a frenetic start-stop chord progression. We may deduce that this quick-jab style of playing is what makes these songs, and these bands, angular.
Throughout rock criticism, angular doesn’t often stand alone. Usually there are other adjectives nearby to give it context: jagged, stabbing, hard-edged, abrasive, and dissonant are the most common — the last suggesting a harmonic dimension in addition to the rhythmic. Angular is also most often used alongside the genre labels post-punk and new wave, with ad hoc descriptors like art-rock, indie-pop, and avant-funk sometimes present.
Guitar is by far the word most commonly associated with angular, and riff is the second most common. The following word cloud provides a sense of which words most frequently accompany angular. Simplified noun, verb, and adjective forms are used. Band names and obvious terms like song and music have been suppressed.

Franz Ferdinand and similar acts are often said to emulate two post-punk bands of the late 1970s, Wire and Gang of Four. The angularity of these bands is typified by the repetitive, syncopated, and staccato opening chords of Wire’s “Three Girl Rhumba” (1977) and Gang of Four’s “Natural’s Not in It” (1979).7

There’s at least one direct line from angular seventies rock to angular aughts rock. Gang of Four guitarist Andy Gill8 went on in the 2000s to produce albums by the Futureheads and other groups that critics described as angular. One Pitchfork review delineates “the Gang of Four gang of four (Bloc Party, Franz Ferdinand, Futureheads, Maximo Park).”
In the 2000s, not only did bands make angular sounds, they had angular looks. Skinny jeans accentuated the young musicians’ gaunt frames, and even their haircuts had geometric flair. NME defined “Blochead” as a “fringe that covers half your face and was made popular by Bloc Party guitarist Russell Lissack.”
There was even the London label Angular Recording Corporation, which launched in 2003 and released CDs by the Long Blondes, Klaxons, and Wetdog, among others.
Angular rock stuck around despite quickly wearing out its welcome. As early as 2006, Pitchfork writers in particular had had enough — though at times it was unclear whether they objected to the sound or to the word. Cory B. Bryom wrote that the year so far had been “stuffed with bands exemplifying the sort of adjectives that give critics a bad name: angular, sharp, spastic — basically, shorthand phrases that don’t actually do much to convey the sound of a record to the reader.”
Disdain for angular music wasn’t limited to writers. Artists also got into the act.
“People need to stop listening to Gang Of fucking Four,” Flats frontman Dan Devine opined in a 2010 interview with NME. “Half a decade of raping the same record? Bloc Party and Franz was five years ago and people still think it’s acceptable to trot out an angular guitar riff and a disco beat. It makes me fucking sick.”
Gang of Four’s debut album “Entertainment!” (1979) was certainly a major influence on the angular rock that followed a quarter-century later. And most bands fitting the description were British. But there were other start and end points. One concert review aptly draws the line from Tom Petty’s “American Girl” (1976) to the sound of the Strokes (see their 2001 hit “Last Night”). New York Times critic Kelefa Sanneh finds the angular sound’s origins in funk, specifically the playing of Jimmy Nolen, guitarist in James Brown’s band for nearly two decades. Nolen “helped inspire two generations of post-punk bands,” Sanneh wrote in 2006, adding parenthetically, “When people talk about ‘angular’ guitars, they often mean ‘Jimmy-Nolen-ish.’”9
Writing in the Times in 2001, Ann Powers set out to “unravel what the word might mean” via a skeptical review of a Shellac concert. In the band’s music, Powers found a sort of toxic masculinity — although she didn’t use that particular term, which was not yet widespread. She then generalized that toxic masculinity to other music described as angular. Suggesting the absence or exclusion of women from the scene, she pointed out that angular is the “antithesis of curvilinear.”10

Women are indeed scarce in the music writing I surveyed for this project. But the Breeders and Sleater-Kinney do show up in a handful of entries. And there is one female artist whose association with angular rivals that of Bloc Party and the Futureheads: Annie Clark, aka St. Vincent. But there’s a difference. In multiple interviews, Clark describes taking her angular sound as far as it would go on 2017’s “Masseduction,” prompting her to shift to an early 1970s style for her follow-up album.11 This is emblematic of how, after the heyday of the 2000s, critics and artists themselves began framing angularity as something to be grown out of.
By the end of the decade, even members of Franz Ferdinand were talking about angular in the past tense.
“Well, the British scene is full of all these guitar bands now,” guitarist Nick McCarthy told Keyboard magazine in 2009. “It’s getting really boring, and it’s kind of peaked. And we didn’t want to repeat ourselves and be in that scene — we were fed up with angular guitar music. We just didn’t want to do that anymore.”12
But bands, as well as critics, have short memories. On 2013 releases, Franz’s guitars were “as angular as ever”13 while Block Party had a “return to form” that was “angular, exciting, and relevant as ever.”14
Angular was in, then it was out, and finally it was just there.
Classical and opera
Angular has its longest legacy in classical music criticism — which should not be surprising given that classical has been around a lot longer than jazz or rock. While my survey cannot claim to be exhaustive, the earliest example I found is from an 1893 New York Times review of a Madison Square Garden piano recital by Arthur Friedheim. Here the unnamed critic gives a very detailed explanation of what they mean by angular.
It must be admitted, however, that [Friedhem’s] style has peculiarities which prevent his work from reaching real greatness. Some of his rapid passages are indistinct, a fault which arises from injudicious use of the pedals and a constant want of balance between the dynamics of the two hands. The left hand, wich has the advantage of dealing with the more sonorous part of the instrument, is allowed altogether too much freedom in respect of power. Added to these defects are a ceaseless indulgence in contrasts of force so sharp as to have the nature of shocks and an overfondness for the staccato touch. These things produce a hardness, a rigidity and angularity of style which preclude any possibility of grace.15
Here, and in other examples continuing to the present day, angularity is associated with too much precision and not enough flexibility. But sometimes critics use angular to mean too much flexibility and not enough precision. A 1947 Times review of a Randolph Hokanson recital found that “rhythmic steadiness was abandoned for a jerky, spasmodic kind of playing, angular in effect.”16
Angularity is not always presented as a negative characteristic for a performer to have. Dissatisfied with one recording of the scherzo from Franz Schubert’s Piano Sonata in A major, Gramophone’s Jed Distler recalled Alfred Brendel’s “valedictory” 1987 rendition, which Distler called “pointedly angular.”17 Brendel is among the performers most often described as angular, alongside pianist Maurizio Polloni and conductors Georg Solti and Nikolaus Harnoncourt.
Conductors may move their batons, arms, or whole bodies jerkily — movements that critics often describe as angular. But only sometimes does this physical description also extend to the sound of the orchestra. Take for example this description of Klaus Tennstedt leading the New York Philharmonic in a 1981 performance of Gustav Mahler’s marathon Ninth Symphony:
But what seemed most interesting yesterday afternoon was the way that Mr. Tennstedt achieved a balance of discipline and spontaneity. The Philharmonic musicians played at their very best for him, yet the effect was never one of earnest ensemble unanimity. Indeed, there was a looseness about the playing that reflected Mr. Tennstedt’s own angular gyrations.18
A performance also may be said to smooth out the angularity of a composition. According to one review, in a 1996 recording of the Finnish composer’s major works, the Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra’s “rich tones infuse [Jean] Sibelius’s cold, icy, angular contours with a current of warmth and humanity that seems not at all out of place.”19
But performance is only a small part of the angular picture. Usually it is the piece being performed, rather than the performance, that is called angular. (I reserve comment about whether it is really possible to separate the two.) In my spreadsheet, references to composers and compositions outnumber references to performers and performances more than five to one.

If there were a competition for most angular composer, there would be a clear winner. Igor Stravinsky (1882-1971) turns up in more than a hundred citations, or nearly 4% of the articles I surveyed. Stravinsky compositions most often described as angular include the operas “The Rake’s Progress” (1951) and “Histoire du Soldat” (The Soldier’s Tale, 1918). Most frequently mentioned is the famously riot-provoking ballet “The Rite of Spring” (1913).

But what, exactly, makes Stravinsky’s music angular? The Rite is characterized by “fleeting, fragmented, angular motifs,” according to one critic,20 while another critic points to its “angular and propulsive rhythms.”21 Still another critic is less specific, referring to the Rite’s “angular, noisy, primitive score.”22 For Stravinsky as for other composers, critics often do not provide much context when they dub a piece angular. Where they bother to be specific, critics identify Stravinsky’s melodic material as angular twice as often as they do his rhythms.
In the survey more broadly, the monophonic aspects of classical music (melodies, lines, themes, motifs, etc.) were called angular in a quarter of all citations. Angular rhythms were discussed in about 4% of articles, and angular harmonies were discussed in only about 1% of articles.
Runner-up in the angular composer contest is Béla Bartók (1881-1945), who is mentioned in about 2% of citations. Critics surveyed describe 21 of his compositions as angular, with three critics applying the label to the “Concerto for Orchestra,” written two years before Bartók’s death. One writer identifies the piece’s “folklike, angular melodies.”23
Critics often contrast angular melodies with “lyrical” ones. Lyrical melodies tend to please the ear, while angular melodies are challenging or even unpleasant. Generally, a lyrical melody is diatonic (meaning it is made up of pitches that conform to a scale) and moves stepwise (meaning the interval between any two pitches is relatively small). Angular melodies, in contrast, use larger intervals (“leap” is a word that sometimes appears nearby angular) and may venture outside the scale into atonality.
Evidently, the boundary between angularity and lyricism is porous. I found multiple examples where virtuosic performers were said to make difficult melodic material more palatable. In one instance, the soprano Claire Booth, performing Oliver Knussen’s “Requiem: Song for Sue” in 2006, “made a piece that could come across as angular and disjointed into something tender and lyrical.”24
The survey results are replete with descriptions of compositions that are “lyrical and angular by turns”25 or that move “freely between angularity and lyricism.”26 These formulations suggest the segregation of melody types within a single piece. But elsewhere the types intermingle, with variations on the phrase “angular lyricism” appearing in many reviews by many authors. “Tonality” and “atonality” appear in equal measure.
Significant overlap exists between “angular” and “modern.” Indeed, most pieces described as angular were composed between 1915 and 2015. The beginning of this period roughly coincides with the advent of serial or 12-tone composition techniques. The figurehead of this movement, Arnold Schoenberg (1874-1951), ranks third in the angular composers contest. Other prominent practitioners who appear frequently in the spreadsheet include Alban Berg, Anton Webern, and Charles Wuorinen. References to serialism, tone rows, and related terms appear in about 3% of citations.
While not a serialist himself, Heitor Villa-Lobos (1887-1959) experimented with a similarly procedural approach to writing his Sixth Symphony. As Carl Bauman explains in American Record Guide:
When he composed it in 1944 he began by graphing the silhouettes of the major Brazilian mountains and transforming these based on 85 chromatic notes into a musical score. The higher the mountain on the graph, the higher the musical pitch, and so forth. While it may seem to some an interesting form of creativity, it can lead to some strange progressions and an angular outline.27
As is true across genres, angular is only rarely applied to female composers. One of them is Melinda Wagner (born 1957), who won a Pulitzer Prize in 1999 for her “Concerto for Flute, Strings, and Percussion.” One critic noted the piece’s “robust angularity.”28 Wagner herself uses the term when describing her compositional process: “I start with a germ of an idea, usually a melody or a mood. It could be small, a sweeping scale of notes or something angular and percussive. Then I see where it goes. My music is melodic and note specific as opposed to big washes of sound.”29 Ellen Taafe Zwilich (b. 1939) and Augusta Read Thomas (b. 1964) are the female composers most often described as angular.
While angular is most often applied to modern compositions, critics do use it occasionally to describe earlier works. Two concert reviews, published in the New York Times less than a month apart in 1995, single out the angularity of the fugue section of Ludwig van Beethoven’s “Hammerklavier,” a keyboard sonata written in 1817. One critic, Edward Rothstein, heard “angular thrusts” in this section during a performance by pianist Andras Schiff.30 The other critic, Bernard Holland, writing about an Alfred Brendel performance, opined that the fugue is “obsessed with a trilling, angular subject.”31 Other early classical titans like Johann Sebastian Bach, George Frideric Handel, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, and Antonio Vivaldi appear more than once in the spreadsheet.
For at least a few critics, music from the Renaissance era can be angular as well. I found 40 instances of the term applied to compositions before 1700, including the “angular inflections and spicy textures” in “Lamentations” by Thomas Tallis (1505-1585)32 and four motets by John Taverner (1490-1545) that “belong to a more angular and florid phase of Tudor style.”33
Jazz and blues
Jazz and blues criticism makes up the smallest group of citations in my survey, with the least diversity in artists described as angular.
Fully 10% of citations mention Thelonious Monk, one of the most revered and mythologized figures in jazz. He is trailed at a considerable distance by Greg Osby, Ornette Coleman, Bill Frisell, and Steve Coleman.

Monk’s piano playing and compositions were unconventional. As New York Times critic John S. Wilson wrote in a 1958 concert review, Monk “couches his melodies in angularities and dissonances that give them a rough and unfamiliar surface on first meeting.”34 Clive Davis of the Sunday Times of London wrote that Monk’s “eccentric, angular attack was built around unexpected silences and mischievous dissonances and ‘wrong’ notes.”35 It’s not just the notes that are off-kilter. The Globe & Mail’s Mark Miller goes further to identify Monk’s phrasing — the peculiar way he performed melodies — as angular. Monk’s phrasing, Miller wrote, was “qualified by an elliptical sort of punctuation.”36
Even after Monk’s death in 1982, jazz musicians continue to write and perform in ways that recall his quirky, herky-jerky style. In one example, pianist Matthew Shipp performed an original piece “full of playful, Monklike angularity and marked by dissonant, pugilistic stabs.”37
Monk’s compositions also live on. The ballad “Pannonica” appears most often in my survey, always in cover form. In one case, the pianist Tommy Flanagan performed the piece at the Village Vanguard in 1986 with its namesake, the Baroness Pannonica de Koenigswarter, in the audience. Wilson, still writing for the New York Times, observed that Flanagan “played the tune in a way that softened the angularity that Mr. Monk gave it, making it more mellow and flowing without draining it of its character.”38 Other Monk tunes that come up more than once include “Brilliant Corners” and “Round Midnight.”
Monk’s departures from convention informed bebop, a subgenre of jazz that emerged in the late 1940s and was characterized by complex melody and harmony. (“Bebop” and “modern” are words that appear frequently alongside angular.) As New York Times critic Robert Palmer wrote in 1987:
In the beginning, modern jazz was a cult of true believers. Modernists spoke be-bop, a language unto itself: “Oop-bop-sh’bam-a-klook-a’mop!” They wore berets, and sunglasses after dark. They devised fiendishly difficult chord sequences, to be executed at impossible tempos, with the express purpose of mystifying the squares and keeping them off the bandstand. The broad outlines of the modern jazz vocabulary were watered down soon enough, often as background sounds for television cop shows and film-noir crime capers. But hard core be-bop was still angular, abrasive, unpredictable, decidedly not sing-along fare.39
In published interviews, musicians in other genres sometimes describe their sound as angular. But 21st-century jazz musicians are the only ones to do so in song titles. There’s “Angular” by Jeremy Pelt (2005), E.J. Strickland’s “Angular Realms” (2009), and “Angular Momentum” by Cloudmakers Trio (2014). Wolfgang Muthspiel released an album in 2020 called “Angular Blues.”
Across one publication
For this project I made extensive use of periodical databases freely accessible via Massachusetts public libraries. In most cases, search results went back only as far as the mid-1990s, with some sources cutting off even more recently. But ProQuest’s historical newspapers archive gives access to the New York Times all the way back to 1851. (I did not find any entries relevant to this project before 1893.) Searching this resource opened a valuable window, albeit a small one, onto the evolution of angular as a term in music criticism over more than a century.

New York Times music critics’ use of angular was modest at first. The term would appear once or twice in one year and then not again for several years. It was not until about 1950 that it began to show up at least once a year. Needless to say, it was all classical music criticism until this point.
Angular first appeared in relation to jazz music in 1958 (Allyn Ferguson “makes a good case for the use of a jagged, angular type of jazz”)40 and rock in 1971 (Janis Joplin “beat out an angular rhythm with one foot”).41 Here again, it was only used in dribs and drabs.
Things began to change in the 1980s. Angular was being used more frequently in jazz reviews, and to a lesser extent in rock reviews. But its use really exploded with the arrival of classical music critic Allan Kozinn, who by a considerable margin is the most prolific of all angular writers in this survey. The adjective appears in 379 of his New York Times articles from 1979 to 2025 — around 6% of his total output for the newspaper. (His closest competitors, American Record Guide’s Allen Gimbel and Roger Hecht and the Financial Times’s Mike Hobart, used angular fewer than half as many times. Kozinn’s New York Times colleague John Pareles, reviewing both rock and jazz, used it 99 times.)
In only three reviews did Kozinn use angular to describe a performance. He most often used the term to describe compositions by Elliott Carter, John Adams, and Aaron Copland. Kozinn applied it to Russian composer Alfred Schnittke’s Piano Sonata No. 1 (1963) in separate concert reviews from 1995, 1998, and 2006. In the first, he described the piece this way: “Acidic passages that betray [Dmitri] Shostakovich’s influence nestle alongside angular 12-tone figures and moments of neo-Romantic introspection.”42
Kozinn’s angular output plummeted after 2012. That year he was reassigned to general cultural reporting, and he later took a buyout. But Kozinn continues to write for the Times occasionally on a freelance basis. In recent years he has penned obituaries for angular composers David Del Tredici and Harold Meltzer.
Across all the sources I surveyed, angular has been in decline over the last 10 years or so. Is this a natural evolution in music critics’ word choices? Or could it be a function of less music criticism appearing in newspapers, magazines, and websites overall? I expect it’s a bit of both.
As we’ve seen, the word “angular” is a blunt instrument. But it’s better than nothing.
Notes
- To avoid any potential copyright infringement, the spreadsheet confines each quotation to only the words directly related to angular. (This essay includes more substantial versions of selected quotations.) Users may sort or search the spreadsheet to find their favorite composers, compositions, performers, publications, or critics. ↩︎
- “Consider the addictively angular verse of Lithium: a part that anyone could play, but nobody else had the vision to write.” DeMain, Bill, et al. “100 Most Influential Guitar Heroes.” Classic Rock, no. 287, May 2021, pp. 25+. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A657722922/ITOF?u=mlin_w_lilly&sid=bookmark-ITOF&xid=d9b9bd6d. Accessed 18 June 2024. ↩︎
- Genesis guitarist Steve Hackett said of the song in an interview: “You had that sort of free-jazz sensibility, but it was done with rock sensibility. And you had the guitar being twinned with the sax the whole time, so it was a very angular approach.” Shteamer, Hank. “King Crimson’s ’21st Century Schizoid Man’: Inside Prog’s Big Bang.” Rolling Stone, 1 Oct. 2019. Online, https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-features/king-crimson-interview-writing-21st-century-schizoid-man-891600/. Accessed 18 March 2021. ↩︎
- “Key Releases: 28.05.11: Catalogue reviews.” Music Week, 28 May 2011, p. 46. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A257334246/ITOF?u=mlin_w_lilly&sid=ITOF&xid=cbfaba7c. Accessed 27 Aug. 2020. ↩︎
- Zoladz, Lindsay. “Going Solo, but He’s Not Alone.” New York Times, 12 Sept. 2021, p. 14(L). Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A675025723/SPN.SP24?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-SPN.SP24&xid=a321958f. Accessed 25 Oct. 2025. ↩︎
- Holden, Stephen. “Familiar Faces in Pop-Country Trio’s New York Debut.” New York Times, 28 Sept. 2012, p. C4(L). Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A303579712/SPN.SP24?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-SPN.SP24&xid=0f88da12. Accessed 20 Oct. 2025. ↩︎
- Gang of Four reunited in 2005 amid a resurgence of interest in their music. ↩︎
- Not to be confused with the music critic of the same name, who wrote for NME and the Independent. Andy Gill the author did in fact use the word angular in a handful of his reviews, but apparently never wrote about Gang of Four. ↩︎
- Sanneh, Kelefa. “Godfather Of Soul, And C.E.O. Of His Band.” New York Times, 27 Dec. 2006, p. E1(L). Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A156396043/SPN.SP24?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-SPN.SP24&xid=b4aa67c7. Accessed 12 Oct. 2025. ↩︎
- Powers, Ann. “Playing All the Angles of a Male Band.” New York Times, 23 Jan. 2001, p. E8. ProQuest. Web. 6 Oct. 2025. ↩︎
- See especially Segal, Victoria, “‘I Could Be Anybody Today…’ St Vincent Interviewed,” Mojo, 21 June 2022, https://www.mojo4music.com/articles/stories/i-could-be-anybody-today-st-vincent-interviewed/. ↩︎
- Regen, Jon. “Synchronized strut: Franz Ferdinand’s Nick McCarthy on the making of Tonight.” Keyboard, Feb. 2009, p. 26+. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A202436307/GPS?u=massw&sid=GPS&xid=9c39ca8c. Accessed 12 Feb. 2020. ↩︎
- Kennedy, Jake. “Franz Ferdinand: Right Thoughts, Right Words, Right Action.” Record Collector, no. 418, Sept. 2013, p. 92. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A346530856/ITOF?u=mlin_w_lilly&sid=ITOF&xid=bde417d7. Accessed 28 Aug. 2020. ↩︎
- “Bloc Party: Octopus.” Music Week, 20 July 2012, p. 8. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A391459263/ITOF?u=mlin_w_lilly&sid=ITOF&xid=6fc26763. Accessed 27 Aug. 2020. ↩︎
- “Amusements.: Mr. Friedheim’s Recitals.” New York Times, 22 Mar. 1893, p. 4. ProQuest. Web. 7 Nov. 2025. ↩︎
- Straus, Noel. “Randolph Hokanson in Recital Bow Here.” New York Times, 18 Dec. 1947, p. 38. ProQuest. Web. 17 Aug. 2025. ↩︎
- Distler, Jed. “Schubert: ‘Late Piano Works, Vol 1.’” Gramophone, vol. 97, no. 1177, Aug. 2019, p. 68. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A599300333/GPS?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=49956b59. Accessed 21 Dec. 2025. ↩︎
- Rockwell, John. “Music: Tennstedt Conducts Mahler’s Ninth.” New York Times, 20 Feb. 1982, p. 12. ProQuest. Web. 31 Aug. 2025. ↩︎
- McKelvey, John P. “Sibelius: Symphony 2, Finlandia, Karelia Suite, Swan of Tuonela.” American Record Guide, vol. 59, no. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1996, pp. 184+. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A18344080/GPS?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=877062fe. Accessed 29 Oct. 2025. ↩︎
- Haldeman, Philip. “Stravinsky: The Rite of Spring with Scriabin: Poem of Ecstasy & with Debussy: La Mer Boulez: Notations VII. (Guide to Records).” American Record Guide, vol. 65, no. 2, Mar. 2002, pp. 166+. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A84053873/GPS?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=f8a5efa7. Accessed 10 Nov. 2025. ↩︎
- Enright, Robert. “Dance review: The rite of spring: Rite of spring modern, urban, up to date: choreographer Mark Godden has made a perfectly contemporary sketch, – part cartoon, – part psychic portrait of himself and his age.” Globe & Mail, 9 May 1997, p. D2. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A30548000/GPS?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=55c84519. Accessed 29 Dec. 2025. ↩︎
- Harris, Robert. “Big Names, Fresh Faces, New Twists.” Globe & Mail, 9 Oct. 2012, p. E2. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A304767603/GPS?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=7a2c7496. Accessed 3 Jan. 2026. ↩︎
- Hecht, Roger. “Bartok: Concerto for Orchestra; 4 Orchestral Pieces; Hungarian Peasant Songs London Philharmonic/Leon Botstein Telarc 80564-76 minutes.” American Record Guide, vol. 64, no. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2001, pp. 75+. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A80371368/GPS?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=35b24446. Accessed 10 Nov. 2025. ↩︎
- Smith, Rowena. “Reviews: Classical: SCO/Knussen City Halls, Glasgow 4/5.” Guardian [London, England], 18 Dec. 2007, p. 36. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A172552338/GPS?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=80953cc8. Accessed 11 Jan. 2026. ↩︎
- Kozinn, Allan. “Review/Music; Conductor on a Marathon 2-Concert Day.” New York Times, 13 Apr. 1989. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A175669119/SPN.SP24?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-SPN.SP24&xid=615e2223. Accessed 21 Sept. 2025. ↩︎
- Kozinn, Allan. “Classical Music in Review.” New York Times, 14 Nov. 1992. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A174994878/SPN.SP24?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-SPN.SP24&xid=7f06053f. Accessed 3 Nov. 2025. ↩︎
- Bauman, Carl. “Villa-Lobos: Symphony No.6, Ruda, God of Love.” American Record Guide, vol. 60, no. 3, May-June 1997, p. 228. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A19926351/GPS?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=2980cf0a. Accessed 30 Oct. 2025. ↩︎
- Gimbel, Allen. “Wagner, M.: Flute Concerto.” American Record Guide, vol. 63, no. 5, Sept. 2000, p. 226. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A65463749/GPS?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=95c64452. Accessed 30 Nov. 2025. ↩︎
- Wetzler, Cynthia Magriel. “Composer Writes Piece For Philharmonic’s 15th.” New York Times, 17 May 1998. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A150197193/SPN.SP24?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-SPN.SP24&xid=497efc05. Accessed 29 Sept. 2025. ↩︎
- Rothstein, Edward. “Bach, Beethoven and Bartok In the Hands of Andras Schiff.” New York Times, 27 Mar. 1995. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A155491439/SPN.SP24?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-SPN.SP24&xid=d0a07d5a. Accessed 27 Sept. 2025. ↩︎
- Holland, Bernard. “Moments Of Inspired Insanity.” New York Times, 19 Apr. 1995. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A155451983/SPN.SP24?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-SPN.SP24&xid=72ab68ee. Accessed 27 Sept. 2025. ↩︎
- Barker, John W. “Lamentations.” American Record Guide, vol. 57, no. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1994, pp. 244+. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A16457792/GPS?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=34a43004. Accessed 27 Oct. 2025. ↩︎
- Barker, John W. “Byrd: Mass for Four Voices, Motets; Taverner: Motets.” American Record Guide, vol. 58, no. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1995, p. 94. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A16346719/GPS?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=50eac2e0. Accessed 27 Oct. 2025. ↩︎
- Wilson, John S. “Thelonious Monk Plays Own Works: Leads Quartet in Concert at Town Hall Devoted to His Jazz Compositions.” New York Times (1923-), 02 Mar. 1959, p. 30. ProQuest. Web. 5 Nov. 2025. ↩︎
- Davis, Clive. “Doing their own thing; CD Offer.” Sunday Times, 13 Nov. 1994, p. 32. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A116954994/GPS?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=dac7aed6. Accessed 1 Mar. 2026. ↩︎
- Miller, Mark. “Signs indicating a revival of his music are appearing.” Globe & Mail, 12 Oct. 1985, p. D5. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A165557788/GPS?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=ec6edcac. Accessed 3 Jan. 2026. ↩︎
- Milkowski, Bill. “Shipp in Disparate Settings.” DownBeat, March 2019, p. 58. Online: https://www.downbeat.com/digitaledition/2019/DB1903/_art/DB1903.pdf. Accessed Aug. 31, 2026. ↩︎
- Wilson, John S. “Jazz: Tommy Flanagan at Village Vanguard.” New York Times, 8 Feb. 1986. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A176434124/SPN.SP24?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-SPN.SP24&xid=8c2c6e1d. Accessed 14 Sept. 2025. ↩︎
- Palmer, Robert. “Be-Bop Redux: Old Is New.” New York Times, 24 July 1987. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A176102233/SPN.SP24?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-SPN.SP24&xid=d4bbc609. Accessed 14 Sept. 2025. ↩︎
- Wilson, John S. “New Broadway Show is Pure Entertainment.” New York Times, 23 Feb. 1958, p. 1. ProQuest. Web. 18 Aug. 2025. ↩︎
- Marks, J. “Janis Keeps Her Promise in ‘Pearl.’” New York Times, 31 Jan. 1971, p. 2. ProQuest. Web. 22 Aug. 2025. ↩︎
- Kozinn, Allan. “A Romantic Sings Out In Mozart.” New York Times, 7 Mar. 1995. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A155497426/SPN.SP24?u=mlin_w_forbes&sid=bookmark-SPN.SP24&xid=5146a3ac. Accessed 27 Sept. 2025. ↩︎









